Tuesday, September 20, 2022
Midland Ontario Municipal Election candidates, 2022
Monday, July 18, 2022
The Brave Pantser - or not
At Quora, I wrote about some of my Nanowrimo experiences. Here is most of my answer at Quora:
Yes, most of the time.
A Nanowrimo story was set in space and I knew the setting very well; someone else had researched it and I thought it cool. I contacted the man for permission to put a story in his setting and he was happy to grant that permission. The setting was:
36 Earth-sized moons and planets around a single star.
So someone else did most of the physics and I only needed to come up with the characters, plot, themes and tone. That’s all!
Okay, that’s a lot. But my story had a firm setting. So I sat down at 11:55pm on October 31, got ready and… really struggled at the start of November 1!
I wrote about some archaeologists and a university on one of the planets and then the story began to pick up momentum.
Nanowrimo only requires 50,000 toward a first draft be written by November 30, and I surpassed that number but I had nothing like a story.
I did have the actual beginnings of a story, I had solid characters, a satisfactory plot - not so much on the page but in my head or in notes about the story. I had, in short, the makings of a good (for me) story; probably not a first draft, but draft 0.6. Most of that work would be thrown out or kept as background in the actual story, but I had pantsed my way into an actual story.
And I learned so much about my science fictional setting. It was indeed fun. Not completely satisfying because it took so long in my writing for the story to appear, but still fun.
One more story about pantsing a story: I wrote a fantasy story based on some daydreams I had as a child (yes, in writing this, I see how much time I spent daydreaming. I had better become a real writer to make that time well-spent!). It had a child stolen from another world and then returned to that world after several years had passed - standard stuff. But because I was pantsing the story, I didn’t know yet why she had been taken or why she had been returned.
And at several points in the story, I could have made that choice, directed the story one way or another … and I chickened out! At every opportunity to make a decision, I passed and left it vague so I could make the decision later.
And the story was fluff. It had not meat. It wasn’t good and my anxiety about making, or not, that decision kinda poisoned the process for me. There were fun moments but the total was not fun. I needed to be a braver pantser.
Tuesday, July 12, 2022
Generic maps to give you ideas and show you perhaps what not to do
@skerples1 offered a 'generic fantasy map' and others joined in with more in the comments.
As is my standard practice, the images shown here have been cropped and shrunk. To see the full images at full size, follow the links:
And more from Skerples:
Ash, the Loom of Doom, offered
And more. There are all fun and maybe they remind us of how many cliches there are out there.
Wednesday, January 5, 2022
I like the research but think I would choose the nap over the idea.
I feel that I run at full speed or I want a nap. I fear that I sleep too many hours a week.
So the possibility of using sleep to find creative insight was encouraging to me. Do something I am nearly addicted to and get a benefit from sounded too good to be true. ... And it is.
Salvador Dali and brief, uh, 'naps' to find creative solutions.
That link is to a Scientific American review and interview with the researchers. Their actual work is here (the quotes in my post are from Scientific American).
“You must seat yourself in a bony armchair, preferably of Spanish style,” he wrote. In your left hand, you were to clench a heavy key, suspended above a plate. Then, he continued, “you will have merely to let yourself be progressively invaded by a serene afternoon sleep, like the spiritual drop of anisette of your soul rising in the cube of sugar of your body.”
As you drifted off, the key would slip from your fingers and clang on the plate, awakening you. He claimed the brief moment spent between wake and sleep would revive your physical and psychic being. And he cautioned that “a mere second is infinitely too long.”
So an important point here is that it is not sleep nor dreams exactly that Dali was trying to access but the unfocused thoughts of a person nearly asleep.
I want to try this technique but also trying to put yourself to sleep and then not sleeping sounds like taking sex almost to orgasm and then stopping to get back to some more mundane activity. Yes, I may have a problem if my analogy for sex is sleep.
Anyway, if there is a way to strongly encourage creative thought, this seems to be it. It is not magic and in the experiment described at the link, it only made the participants more likely to solve the problem; not certain to do it.
From the article:
Those who slept for longer periods actually did worse than both those who briefly slept and those who stayed awake.